When this approach is needed

Typical business situations
Case 1

Warehouse design or expansion

A new building, a re-layout or a change of rack type must meet peak throughput at acceptable cost.

DecisionDoes the design hold up on the busiest days, with how many trucks, docks and staff, and at what cost of ownership?

Case 2

The automation business case

Vendors quote nominal throughput; operations experiences variability.

DecisionWhat throughput and payback are realistic once variability, downtime and peaks are included?

Case 3

Production and contract-manufacturing chains

Yield losses, batch sizes and capacity limits interact across several stages and partners.

DecisionWhere is the bottleneck, how long does material take to reach the market, and what changes it?

Case 4

Inventory and operating policies

A policy such as a months-on-hand target consumes capacity across the whole network.

DecisionWhat does the policy require at each node, and where does it break?

What you receive
  • A simulation model validated against data and, where possible, an independent model
  • Throughput, utilisation, queue and waiting-time distributions — median and tail, not just averages
  • Comparisons of design and policy alternatives on service and total cost of ownership
  • Optionally, an interactive front end so planners can keep running what-if scenarios
How an engagement runs
  1. ScopeAgree the decisions the model must support and the performance measures that matter.
  2. BuildModel the operation at the level of detail the decision needs — and no more.
  3. ValidateCompare against historical performance, analytical results and, where available, CAD or planning data.
  4. ExperimentRun the alternatives across realistic variability and recommend a design or policy.
Reference
Approach
Warehouses, production chains and distribution networks are too variable and interdependent to be planned on averages. Discrete-event, agent-based and Monte Carlo simulation reproduce that variability, so expansions, automation, layouts and operating policies can be evaluated — and their risks understood — before they are built.
Core question
How will this operation perform on its worst realistic days, and which design or policy delivers the required service at the lowest total cost?
Method
Discrete-event simulation, agent-based modelling and Monte Carlo analysis, combined with analytical models (queueing, cycle times) and parametric CAD where the physical layout matters.
Evidence
The Warehouse Model couples a parametric FreeCAD model and an analytical model (shown identical on 400 designs) with a discrete-event simulation of the day, total cost of ownership and an optimiser. The Supply Chain Digital Twin is an open-source example; more open models are listed on the Technical depth page.
Related offer
Network Flexibility Study and Disruption Diagnostic — simulation supports both.
Get in touch

Describe the operational change you are considering. I will tell you what a simulation could settle.

Book a conversation →